<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Driver&#8217;s Ed Photos of Dead Youth Didn&#8217;t Violate Family&#8217;s Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phiprivacy.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phiprivacy.net/?p=1649</link>
	<description>Medical Privacy: Who&#039;s losing your data? Who&#039;s selling it?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:04:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dissent</title>
		<link>http://www.phiprivacy.net/?p=1649&#038;cpage=1#comment-7367</link>
		<dc:creator>Dissent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phiprivacy.net/?p=1649#comment-7367</guid>
		<description>If a medic renders services to an accident victim while in their capacity as part of a HIPAA-covered entity, then even if the accident was in a public space, the medic cannot discuss the services rendered as that would be a HIPAA violation, right?   How is taking a photo and then displaying it not exposing information obtained while in the capacity of a HIPAA-covered entity?   What the public can do is one thing, but HIPAA-covered entities are held to a different/higher standard, I thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a medic renders services to an accident victim while in their capacity as part of a HIPAA-covered entity, then even if the accident was in a public space, the medic cannot discuss the services rendered as that would be a HIPAA violation, right?   How is taking a photo and then displaying it not exposing information obtained while in the capacity of a HIPAA-covered entity?   What the public can do is one thing, but HIPAA-covered entities are held to a different/higher standard, I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.phiprivacy.net/?p=1649&#038;cpage=1#comment-7360</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phiprivacy.net/?p=1649#comment-7360</guid>
		<description>This is pretty straightforward, this lawsuit clearly had no merit whatsoever.

Generally when you are outdoors in a public area (such as in a street) you have absolutely no expectation of privacy whatsoever. You can be filmed or photographed without permission. HIPAA doesnt even come into play, a random bystander could have also legally photographed the scene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty straightforward, this lawsuit clearly had no merit whatsoever.</p>
<p>Generally when you are outdoors in a public area (such as in a street) you have absolutely no expectation of privacy whatsoever. You can be filmed or photographed without permission. HIPAA doesnt even come into play, a random bystander could have also legally photographed the scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
